Through Ending a Harsh Tory Welfare Policy, This Financial Plan Clearly Outlines How Labour Will Fight the Battle to Revitalize Britain
Just recently, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour budget. People have been asking for Labour’s mission and principles to be more clearly articulated. Through the decisions made – a transition to a fairer tax system, focusing on wealth to fund tackling child poverty, quality public services and the cost of living – we have unequivocally demonstrated what we believe in.
This is why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the battles to come. And it’s why the protests from the right began right away.
The Main Political Divide in British Politics
The central division in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to change it so it benefits everyday working people, and on the other, our opponents, who favor the current system and the failed ideology of the past. We must now take on, and win, the debate.
The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and instead, by every standard, they got much worse. Their doctrinaire austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, reducing investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – proved ineffective.
Record of Failure Under the Former Government
Living standards fell by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages remained flat, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people scarred by Covid were abandoned. The record of failure goes on.
One budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a long-term plan for rebuilding and for restructuring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the case for why our approach will reap dividends.
Social Security and Child Poverty
Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they failed to tackle the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state is forced to paying more to deal with the symptoms instead of the solution.
That’s why we are constructing more social housing than for a generation, raising wages and new rights for workers, massively boosting investment in infrastructure and new industries, reducing waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.
Removing the Two-Child Benefit Cap
It’s also why we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.
For eight long years, since it was introduced, low-income families with children have suffered from a unjust social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.
It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being callous and immoral.
Real Impact in Local Areas
I know from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in cramped, damp homes, parents this Christmas depending on food banks for a modest meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already stretched but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of severe deprivation.
Long-Term Effects of Youth Hardship
Just a quarter of pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among affluent families. This predisposes them for the disadvantages they face during their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and ill health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.
Addressing child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the three billion pound cost of removing the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.
That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 extra children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it will not occur overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was vital.
The cap was a symbol to 14 years of unsuccessful rightwing ideology. Now it is abolished.
Fair Financing for Measures
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these initiatives are being funded in a just way – from a new gaming tax, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Conclusion
Equity and purpose – that’s how we will succeed in the contest of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we won the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I repeatedly said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political megaphone and set the agenda more forcefully about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.
So let’s keep hold of it and prevail in this struggle about how we will rebuild Britain and address the deep inequalities holding us back.